acroyear: (network down)
[personal profile] acroyear
...to get a simple answer to the following question:

What is the optimal resolution an image file should have to not look like absolute crap when enlarged to 5x7, 8x10, 8x12, a 12x36 banner, or a 12x24 poster?

My google-fu is failing me on this.

I keep seeing things either useless, or in "DPI" - I don't think "DPI", dammit, I'm looking at 3456x2304 and 3280x2460 and I want a straight answer dammit.  DPI is all about the printer - I don't care about the printer, I am asking about the source image itself.

(I also keep seeing sites about 5mp and "expensive memory", and all that is SO 3 years ago...).

Ok, one site is finally hinting that 7200x4800 (or 34mp) is best for that 24x12 poster, so that's out with what I've got... guess I'll go with a set of 8x12s mounted side by side.

of course, along the way I run into sites about resolutions to enlarging the european parliament, and high resolution images on other...enlargements...

oh well.  gotta go for now.

Date: 2009-01-23 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tyrus.livejournal.com
Maybe it doesn't have a simple answer? :p

I've printed out perfectly good enlargements up to, I think, 20 or 24 inches on the long side from my 6mp 10D. That's 3072x2048 without cropping. And I know 11x14's look fine, as I just took a look at one And it depends a lot on the camera, I've seen lower MP cameras with a better sensor and better glass make better prints.

As a general rule I go by 300 pixels per inch, but my example above obviously ignores that. Do you have a Costco membership? Their enlargements are relatively cheap, I think you can get a 20x30 for $10. I'd recommend just picking an image and getting one and see how it looks.

Profile

acroyear: (Default)
Joe's Ancient Jottings

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 11:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios