acroyear: (grumblecat)
[personal profile] acroyear
Some Americans Lack Food, but USDA Won't Call Them Hungry - washingtonpost.com:
The U.S. government has vowed that Americans will never be hungry again. But they may experience "very low food security."

Every year, the Agriculture Department issues a report that measures Americans' access to food, and it has consistently used the word "hunger" to describe those who can least afford to put food on the table. But not this year.
Ending Hunger - washingtonpost.com (editorial):
THE AGRICULTURE Department has taken what you might call the Scarlett O'Hara approach to Americans without enough to eat: It will never call them hungry again. Rumbling stomachs? Malnourishment? That's not hunger, the department says. It's experiencing "very low food security."
Mike the Mad Biologist:
Some are not happy with the Orwellian double speak:
Anti-hunger advocates say the new words sugarcoat a national shame. "The proposal to remove the word 'hunger' from our official reports is a huge disservice to the millions of Americans who struggle daily to feed themselves and their families," said David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World, an anti-hunger advocacy group. "We . . . cannot hide the reality of hunger among our citizens."

But we can hide the reality of hunger among our citizens, particularly if we don't believe it exists in the first place:

That 35 million people in this wealthy nation feel insecure about their next meal can be hard to believe, even in the highest circles. In 1999, Texas Gov. George W. Bush, then running for president, said he thought the annual USDA report -- which consistently finds his home state one of the hungriest in the nation -- was fabricated.

"I'm sure there are some people in my state who are hungry," Bush said. "I don't believe 5 percent are hungry."

Bush said he believed that the statistics were aimed at his candidacy. "Yeah, I'm surprised a report floats out of Washington when I'm running a presidential campaign," he said.

The agency usually releases the report in the fall, for reasons that "have nothing to do with politics," Nord said.

"Even in the highest circles?" That should read "especially in the highest circles." If someone else's suffering is inconvenient to our economic and moral perogative, then we should just 'declare it' away. That's what aristocrats do.

Bush's America: Freedom is on the march, and apparently, hunger has cut-and-run.
pardon me while I go on with my "high food security"...

sheesh.

I wrote about this in my blog as well

Date: 2006-11-17 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fiona64.livejournal.com
I was completely gobsmacked by the double-speak. Jeff summed it up nicely: "People with eating disorders have food insecurity; people who cannot by grocieries are *hungry.*"

Profile

acroyear: (Default)
Joe's Ancient Jottings

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 06:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios