I think the ratio of the number of people who really don't want to fly because of potential terrorists to the number of people who don't want to fly simply because all of the carry-on restrictions of things considered normal make them to sick to their stomachs is a very small number...
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 12:38 am (UTC)Doc
no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 03:28 am (UTC)Count me in the latter group ...
Date: 2006-08-11 01:13 am (UTC)Re: Count me in the latter group ...
Date: 2006-08-11 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 11:20 am (UTC)Restrictions won't ever work. There is no way you can restrict every dangerous substance that could possibly be snuck on to a plane and still allow passengers on. Terrorists will find a way around restrictions. What will get them is excellent detective work. We need well-trained, well-paid cops and intelligence folks, particularly those with linguistic skills. (One of the reasons I'm hoping my son grows up bilingual, having a native Arabic speaker as a daycare provider.)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 01:45 pm (UTC)The upside is that maybe, just maybe, Amtrak will survive. I much prefer train travel (no real restrictions on what I can take on a train, no security checks, bigger seats, the ability to get up and go for a walk (if only to the cafe car) to plain travel any day. Unfortunately for anything west of the Appalachians (for the most part), it's not terribly realistic.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 03:32 am (UTC)I doubt radical, militant librarians count as well-behaved women. ;-)