...is that in spite of saying they're doing it "for the artists", any moneys won from settling those suits (minus the legal fees) has no way of reconnecting to the specific artists who's material was "stolen". Its not like they really have a "list" of what you copy or have any intention of trying to assemble such a list...
it is nothing but pure profit for the label and the artists continue to get shafted as they always have been.
it is nothing but pure profit for the label and the artists continue to get shafted as they always have been.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 03:42 am (UTC)what's up with that?
sheesh...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 03:59 am (UTC)And thus ends our little tale. A true happy ending for a change. :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 11:51 am (UTC)the RIAA only has grounds where *digital* music is concerned because of the DMCA. prior to that law, the RIAA's rights ended once the record was in your hand and only the performance laws (protected by ASCAP and BMI) applied.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
:)
Seeing as how the V.P. is such a V.I.P., shouldn't we keep the P.C. on the Q.T.? 'Cause if it leaks to the V.C. he could end up M.I.A., and then we'd all be put out in K.P.