rant on cddb
Dec. 8th, 2005 10:24 amwhoever enters the listings for classical music sucks and i want to kill him.
he (well, it *could* be a she, but guys are more geeky for doing this sort of thing) has a knack (about 40% of the entries are like this) for using the "artist" field to store the movement details and leave the main track title as the overarching title. e.g., for Bernstein's cd of Copeland pieces, the cddb entry has tracks 9-12 all titled "Copeland: Rodeo", with track 9's artist listed as "1. Buckaroo Holiday", yada for the other three.
Yes, its nice that they felt like separating things. However, iTunes and most other mp3 rippers use the artist field to sort by, which means that for this CD, every track will end up in its own folder, unless I change it before I rip, which even in iTunes is a painfully tedious amount of work I simply don't have the time for.
jerk.
he (well, it *could* be a she, but guys are more geeky for doing this sort of thing) has a knack (about 40% of the entries are like this) for using the "artist" field to store the movement details and leave the main track title as the overarching title. e.g., for Bernstein's cd of Copeland pieces, the cddb entry has tracks 9-12 all titled "Copeland: Rodeo", with track 9's artist listed as "1. Buckaroo Holiday", yada for the other three.
Yes, its nice that they felt like separating things. However, iTunes and most other mp3 rippers use the artist field to sort by, which means that for this CD, every track will end up in its own folder, unless I change it before I rip, which even in iTunes is a painfully tedious amount of work I simply don't have the time for.
jerk.
How I Get Around This...
Date: 2005-12-08 03:42 pm (UTC)And, unfortunately, this problem is rampant in other genres, as well, on cddb. My pet peeve is that each disc of a two-disc set will be labeled differently!
Re: How I Get Around This...
Date: 2005-12-08 04:00 pm (UTC)