Remember when I said that any future VP will get ignored and the powerlessness of the office restored because they press simply will never let another VP get as powerful as Cheney ever again? The editorials on that subject are already starting...
Don't Let Cheney Ruin It - washingtonpost.com:
Don't Let Cheney Ruin It - washingtonpost.com:
But in many minds now, Cheney's free-wheeling exercise of executive power has impinged on the authority of the presidency. And his stormy and controversial tenure in the Bush White House may well produce a less powerful vice president in the next administration.I note that nobody in the media is actually actively trying to get Cheney's power restored to what it should be - he gets to keep it all, but any future VP is screwed. This is why, should Obama have lost, I would never have wanted him in the VP slot. It would have been a waste.
That is just as well. The vice presidency should never have been raised to a full partnership in running the country. Ronald Reagan prompted talk of a "co-presidency" when he flirted with the notion of taking former President Gerald Ford as his running mate in 1980, but cooler heads prevailed. The wisdom of that dismissal has been confirmed in the Cheney experience.