Isn't that like the newspaper articles saying how Harry Potter was losing his audience, and then admitting further down how the book sales for each sequel set new world records? Makes you wonder what the reporters are smoking.
I don't blame the reporters, I blame the editors who don't look for such contradictions (and/or are tainted by their sponsers to not look for it), and thus allow different reporters, each with different sources, to publish conflicting information in the same issue...
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 01:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 01:18 pm (UTC)