on taxes...

[acroyear]

Sam Harris: A New Year's Resolution for the Rich:

The wealthiest Americans often live as though they and their children had nothing to gain from investments in education, infrastructure, clean-energy, and scientific research. For instance, the billionaire Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft, recently helped kill a proposition that would have created an income tax for the richest 1 percent in Washington (one of seven states that has no personal income tax). All of these funds would have gone to improve his state's failing schools. What kind of society does Ballmer want to live in--one that is teeming with poor, uneducated people? Who does he expect to buy his products? Where will he find his next batch of software engineers? Perhaps Ballmer is simply worried that the government will spend his money badly--after all, we currently spend more than almost every other country on education, with abysmal results. Well, then he should say so--and rather than devote hundreds of thousands of dollars to stoking anti-tax paranoia in his state, he should direct some of his vast wealth toward improving education, like his colleague Bill Gates has begun to do.

One truly misses the wisdom of Henry Ford, who when asked why he pays his workers so much, replied, "so they can afford to buy my cars."

Comments

[lookingaround17.livejournal.com]

I think it's beyond dumb to have a society of people who are poor and uneducated enough that they feel they have nothing to lose by crime, including crime against the rich: talk about dumbassed. Even from a completely selfish, I'm-wealthy-and-want-decent-servants-and-not-to-be-killed-in-civil-unrest viewpoint, it's really impractical--