a better way?
Jan. 5th, 2009 12:21 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Uncertain Principles: The Football Positioning System:
It's NFL playoff time, which means that sports fans will be treated to the sight of the most high-stakes farce in sports, namely the ritual of "bringing out the chains" to determine whether a team has gained enough yards for a first down. We've all seen this: the play is whistled dead, a referee un-stacks the pile of players, picks up the ball, and puts it down more or less where the player was stopped. Then he tosses the ball into the middle of the field, to a second referee, who tries to replicate the spot closer to the center of the field. Then a guy on the sideline carrying a big stick (connected by a ten-yard chain to another stick held by another guy) tries to put the end of the stick at the same position as the ball.The premise has a point - just as computers and video (i.e., technology) has improved the accuracy of the game (if not the game itself) from a penalty standpoint, shouldn't technology also be used as this otherwise fraught-with-error-sources means of first-down-ness?
Three plays later, the spotting procedure is repeated, and then the sticks are bought out to the center of the field, the chain is stretched taut, and they measure the position of the ball to the nearest millimeter. Because, of course, there's absolutely no error in placing the sticks.
The whole ritual is preposterous, and anybody with the slightest scientific inclination has to wonder: "Isn't there a better way of doing this?" So, what would be required to do a better job of this?
no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-07 07:37 am (UTC)OTOH: It needn't be GPS, merely S[tadium]PS -- instead of measuring signals from four satellites, measure from for fixed transmitters attached to corners of the stadium. (Or, wait ... you only need three, right? Since we don't need to measure the ball's altitude?)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 05:50 pm (UTC)If he's off by an inch after running downfield...
On the other hand, I do assume these guys don't get the big pro jobs until they can prove some degree of accuracy and consistency...but that could be a crappy assumption.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 07:08 pm (UTC)As for the yardsticks, I have a feeling that they also have a second set sitting on the sidelines (for where the 10 yards begin) and the guy lines up based on that. While it isn't exact, it is probably a pretty good estimation.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 08:34 pm (UTC)But, still love the sport, so it is what it is.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 08:55 pm (UTC)Besides, half the fun of watching football is about yelling at the refs for missed calls anyway.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-05 10:34 pm (UTC)It has been used for years in such "sports" as Cow Chip Throws, and works to a fraction of an inch.