Top court upholds photo ID voting law - Yahoo! News:
Call it "Identi-Eeze". Douglas would love it.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld a tough state law requiring voters to show photo identificationoh hell, why don't we just nationalize the entire damn ID process, DNA-embedded and all and just get it over with.
[...]
"The Indiana law purports to solve a problem that does not exist" - U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer of New York
Call it "Identi-Eeze". Douglas would love it.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-28 09:21 pm (UTC)They'd just make sure to charge $75 for it, payable only by check or major credit card. But no, that wouldn't be a "tax," either -- only Democrats would do that. This would be a "fee" in order to implement the system.
"What's that? No bank account or credit card? I'm sorry, you'll have to submit six forms of identification with government-approved photo down at the courthouse and wait three weeks for approval to cast a provisionary ballot..."
no subject
Date: 2008-04-28 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-29 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-29 01:27 am (UTC)Exactly my point.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-29 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-29 12:52 pm (UTC)And given that my state didn't recognize my passport as a valid way to prove my identity to the MVA ...