bleh. Maybe we can get some sort of grassroots thing going making there be a specified ratio of area to boundary length below which they can't go, or insist on lower resolution in the voter maps.
Annoyingly, it's probably right. Just one of a dozen or so naked power grabs that the Constitution doesn't prohibit because the Framers really weren't that devious.
There are laws against gerrymandering districts based on race. Gerrymanders based on politics and partisanship, however, are completely legal.[1]
[1] For now, at least. There are four Supreme Court Justices who think that there are limits to how egregiously you can gerrymander a district, and one (Kennedy), who thinks there are limits, but can't articulate them and therefore refuses to impose any.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-28 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-28 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-28 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-28 07:29 pm (UTC)Doc
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 03:55 pm (UTC)[1] For now, at least. There are four Supreme Court Justices who think that there are limits to how egregiously you can gerrymander a district, and one (Kennedy), who thinks there are limits, but can't articulate them and therefore refuses to impose any.