Nov. 3rd, 2008
San Diego Mayor Sanders on gay marriage
Nov. 3rd, 2008 05:03 pmWockner: Republican San Diego mayor embraces same-sex marriage, says daughter is a lesbian:
"I am here this afternoon to announce that I will sign the resolution that the City Council passed yesterday directing the city attorney to file a brief in support of gay marriage [with the California Supreme Court].Hope rings eternal...
"My plan, that has been reported publicly, was to veto the resolution, so I feel like I owe all San Diegans right now an explanation for this change of heart.
"During the campaign two years ago, I announced that I did not support gay marriage and instead supported civil unions and domestic partnerships.
"I have personally wrestled with that position ever since. My opinions on this issue have evolved significantly -- as I think the opinions of millions of Americans from all walks of life have.
"In order to be consistent with the position I took during the mayoral election, I intended to veto the council resolution. As late as yesterday afternoon, that was my position.
"The arrival of the resolution -- to sign or veto -- in my office late last night forced me to reflect and search my soul for the right thing to do.
"I have decided to lead with my heart, which is probably obvious at the moment -- to do what I think is right, and to take a stand on behalf of equality and social justice. The right thing for me to do is sign this resolution.
"For three decades, I have worked to bring enlightenment, justice and equality to all parts of our community.
"As I reflected on the choices I had before me last night, I just could not bring myself to tell an entire group of people in our community they were less important, less worthy or less deserving of the rights and responsibilities of marriage -- than anyone else -- simply because of their sexual orientation.
"A decision to veto this resolution would have been inconsistent with the values I have embraced over the past 30 years.
"I do believe that times have changed. And with changing time, and new life experiences, come different opinions. I think that's natural, and it's certainly true in my case.
"Two years ago, I believed that civil unions were a fair alternative. Those beliefs, in my case, have changed.
"I acknowledge that not all members of our community will agree or perhaps even understand my decision today.
"All I can offer them is that I am trying to do what I believe is right.
"I have close family members and friends who are a member of the gay and lesbian community. Those folks include my daughter Lisa, as well as members of my personal staff.
"I want for them the same thing that we all want for our loved ones -- for each of them to find a mate whom they love deeply and who loves them back; someone with whom they can grow old together and share life's experiences.
"And I want their relationships to be protected equally under the law. In the end, I couldn't look any of them in the face and tell them that their relationship -- their very lives -- were any less meaningful than the marriage I share with my wife Rana. Thank you."
Jim Hill : How sometimes being in the wrong place is the right thing to do:
BTW, that episode is the same one where the UK release had the incredibly funny "O Danny Boy" (Animal, Swedish Chef, Beaker) I posted around St. Pat's Day.
In this week's "Why For" column, Jim Hill shares a story that Wally Boag once told him. Which explains how -- thanks to being accidentally upstaged by Steve Martin -- this Disney Legend wound up appearing on "The Muppet Show"Wally Boag was the star for a great many years of the Golden Horseshoe Review in Disneyland's Frontierland (taking breaks to train the WDW cast as well through the 70s). In the 5th season of the Muppet Show, he was a guest star and it really is one of the best episodes of the season (which is a tough thing, 'cause a LOT of them are good). Search YouTube for some excerpts. You can catch Wally in his prime act on one of last year's Disney Treasures dvds.
BTW, that episode is the same one where the UK release had the incredibly funny "O Danny Boy" (Animal, Swedish Chef, Beaker) I posted around St. Pat's Day.
McCain sues to force Va. to count military ballots:
However, there's one thing in the way: we don't know what the gap is, but we DO know how many absentee ballots are potentially coming in. So the rules for counting absentees should be just like they always are: if the gap between the first and second is bigger than the total number of absentee ballots, then there's no reason to count them.
If the gap is smaller, than the finals should wait for all of the time the law requires for the absentee ballots to arrive. If that time is 10 days, then fine. We wait.
Back in the day, it would be over a month before the country found out who won, 'cause the electoral college actually had to take time to meet with the totals they were given and few states could find out what the other states knew.
On the other hand, I want to know who said that Virginia wasn't going to wait? Who said what that actually led to the McCain suit in the first place?
Mind you, I do expect the total absentee ballot to be bigger than the gap, because of how many early voters there were (all of whom are technically absentees).
More details:
McCain lawsuit asks federal court to order Va. to count late overseas military ballots -- Newsday.com:
Technically, VA law says 7pm tomorrow and that's that.
RICHMOND, Va. - John McCain's campaign sued Virginia's electoral board Monday, hours before the election, seeking to force the state to count late-arriving overseas military ballots.Now, I am all for ensuring that everybody gets the vote (and it doesn't matter who they support, Democrats should be pulling for this as well if they don't want to admit to hypocrisy).
The lawsuit asks a federal judge to order the State Board of Elections to count any overseas absentee ballots sent by November 4 and received by local election officials as late as November 14.
McCain claims the rights of military voters are protected by the federal Uniform and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Rights Act of 1986.
The campaign's complaint says that Virginia military voters posted overseas who support the Republican nominee will be denied their right to vote unless the court grants the order.
No hearing was scheduled by early Monday afternoon.
However, there's one thing in the way: we don't know what the gap is, but we DO know how many absentee ballots are potentially coming in. So the rules for counting absentees should be just like they always are: if the gap between the first and second is bigger than the total number of absentee ballots, then there's no reason to count them.
If the gap is smaller, than the finals should wait for all of the time the law requires for the absentee ballots to arrive. If that time is 10 days, then fine. We wait.
Back in the day, it would be over a month before the country found out who won, 'cause the electoral college actually had to take time to meet with the totals they were given and few states could find out what the other states knew.
On the other hand, I want to know who said that Virginia wasn't going to wait? Who said what that actually led to the McCain suit in the first place?
Mind you, I do expect the total absentee ballot to be bigger than the gap, because of how many early voters there were (all of whom are technically absentees).
More details:
McCain lawsuit asks federal court to order Va. to count late overseas military ballots -- Newsday.com:
That lawsuit alleges that ballots for overseas military voters were mailed too late to ensure they are returned by the deadline. Defendants are the chairwoman, vice chairman and executive secretary of the state elections board.Ok, so it appears the 10 day delay is somewhat arbitrary, based on a guestimate of the last postmarked date relative to Sept 20th. Still, the state should know how many it mailed to military personal and be able to make a decision, AFTER tomorrow's counts (of votes and absentees already submitted), whether or not it needs to wait for any missing votes to arrive.
A 1986 federal law requires ballots to be mailed to military voters in foreign countries at least 45 days before the election, which this year would have been Sept. 20. The lawsuit alleges the state didn't have the ballots printed and sent to local officials by then, meaning they may not have been mailed overseas until October.
Ashley L. Taylor Jr., an attorney for McCain, said tens of thousands of oversees military absentee ballots could be voided unless the deadline is extended.
"The last thing you want is to have a service member in Afghanistan or Iraq who received his ballot too late not being able to vote in this election," Taylor said.
Technically, VA law says 7pm tomorrow and that's that.
Classic quotes...
Nov. 3rd, 2008 10:44 pm"Uh, it was my understanding that there would be no math."
"Also, try and listen to some music. Especially the Allman Brothers."
"This is the part of the job I hate..."
"I can't believe I'm losing to this guy!"
"I just loved how you stayed silent for a whole hour. Great how you show you're not all talk."
"Strategery."
"Also, try and listen to some music. Especially the Allman Brothers."
"This is the part of the job I hate..."
"I can't believe I'm losing to this guy!"
"I just loved how you stayed silent for a whole hour. Great how you show you're not all talk."
"Strategery."