May. 8th, 2008

acroyear: (getting steamed)
You know, the ones where the proponents insisted verbally that the amendment didn't mean that same sex couples that get private contractual agreements for benefits would have their rights to such contracts and benefits slashed?

And remember how we read them as saying EXACTLY that - that the text was precisely the type that would void such contracts and give gay couples absolutely no rights at all.

And they insisted NO, we wouldn't want to do something like that, we just want to protect marriage.

Well, the courts have finally had their say, and we were right.

Gay couples are fucked.

As are their children.

No health care benefits even if the company wants to give them, no visitation rights in a hospital, no beneficiary agreements for stocks and insurance, no joint mortgages, nothing.  not even a car loan co-signing.

In the state of Michigan, if these contracts involve a gay couple they are as of now null and void.

The religious right assholes just got their wish - being gay means being a second class citizen in that state forever.

Dispatches from the Culture Wars: Michigan Partnership Benefits Killed by Court:
In a long-awaited and very disappointing ruling, the Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that any partnership benefits granted to gay couples, even those as part of negotiated union agreements, are unconstitutional under the anti-gay marriage amendment, Proposal 2, passed in 2004. After the passage of that amendment, the attorney general ruled that a state contract that included such benefits was illegal and that ruling was challenged on behalf of several cities and public universities in the state.

The district court ruled that Proposal 2 did not affect such benefits, but that was overturned by the appeals court and the supreme court upheld the appeals court ruling. The tragic irony of this is that despite the "save the children" rhetoric from the anti-gay crowd, the first people affected by this ruling will be the children of gay couples who may lose health care and other protections as a result.
What makes me pissed is this exact same text passed in Virginia and no matter how hard I tried to explain that this would happen, I still couldn't get my mother passed the "but it's protecting marriage" bullshit.

She voted for it here.

And REALLY pissed me off.

And this is why.

You give a community an anonymous way to show themselves as utter bigots and they will do exactly that.  The churches of the religious right today are utterly founded on principles bigotry and hatred.

And yes, I WILL hate them back.
acroyear: (fof good book)
...of "God's Love" bringing people together: NOT.

I'm having a shitty day with this, you know.

It started with hearing about yet more of the anti-gay hatred in the Anglican church, with some Anglican bishops not attending a conference simply because some American Episcopal Bishops who voted for and support the gay bishop from New Hampshire would actually be attending.

A man being nothing but what he is, called to minister to his church and people, and gay, has divided my church apart to the point where I simply can not attend in what I believe to be a Christian conscience.

It wasn't enough to hate the gay bishop - they have to hate his friends as well.

"Who is my neighbor?"

Jesus answered that.  He couldn't have possibly been any clearer.  Yet NOBODY seems to know what he said.

Ok, maybe 50% of the population.  But the other 50% are just ruining everything by hating that 50% for believing in Love before hate.

and I am just sick.
acroyear: (ponder this)
The real fundamental flaw in all of this Michigan and Virginia crap: it should not be possible for a constitution to be amended by a simple majority vote.

Better still would be that all constitutional amendments should be decided upon different days from any general election so as to not involve the politics of turnout for a particular candidate to influence it.  A constitution should be independent of all other politics, something decided upon because it matters, not because its convenient.  Amending a constitution should never be convenient; not for the proposers, not for the approvers.

So may it someday be, but only AFTER we've managed to undo this mess in the 12+ states that have this bullshit (including Virginia's which is even more restrictive than Michigan's).

Profile

acroyear: (Default)
Joe's Ancient Jottings

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 05:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios