compress this?
Aug. 23rd, 2007 11:25 amVia a /. entry, here's an example of how compression can ruin music, using Paul McCartney's late 80s hit, "Figure of Eight".
In Wikipedia, they give Rush's Vapor Trails as an example of an insanely compressed album. I'm inclined to agree. One of the reasons I listen to prog rock is the dynamic range as much as the instrumental variety and melodic and harmonic approaches. And the main reason I hate "modern" rock is that it ALL sounds flat, all at the same volume and thickness, no variety at all. Just horrid...
from a comment:
In Wikipedia, they give Rush's Vapor Trails as an example of an insanely compressed album. I'm inclined to agree. One of the reasons I listen to prog rock is the dynamic range as much as the instrumental variety and melodic and harmonic approaches. And the main reason I hate "modern" rock is that it ALL sounds flat, all at the same volume and thickness, no variety at all. Just horrid...
from a comment:
"It's Good Enough" For the tin-eared masses. The bar of quality for audio/music/telephony has never been lower. We now accept crap MP3 audio as "acceptable", stuttering vocoders and dropped calls as "tolerable", and reduced/compressed bandwidth as "louder (hence better)". We are now getting spoon-fed the worst quality audio since wax recordings and the Western Electric "Noiseless" recording system of movies from the 30-40's. And like everything else around us that continues to suck worse and worse, we take it in stride, shrug and say "well, it sounds good enough, I guess."
Don't get me wrong - I'm not a Luddite, and I love the Digital revolution of music. I am just sickened by it's apparent side-effects, and AMAZED at the tolerance we the "consuming public" have for getting fed shit. As long as we accept this as the standard of quality we find acceptable, the various producers and manufacturers will keep feeding us more and crappier garbage.