"family values" - the great UNequalizer
Feb. 18th, 2007 11:39 amIllegitimate Complaints - New York Times:
The sordid details surrounding the battle over Dannielynn have led many people to wish that we could revive traditional family values and re-establish marriage as the central institution for organizing sexual relationships and child-rearing. But as usual, the lessons of history are more complex. The fact that Dannielynn has a right to inherit from either of her parents is the result of legal processes that have undermined the role of marriage in determining people’s economic and social rights. Surely this change is a welcome corrective to the injustice of traditional marriage laws and family values that stigmatized “bastards” for life.
It’s not as if the old laws of marriage and the old family values stopped people from engaging in sordid sexual liaisons; they merely swept the casualties under the rug. When the future President Grover Cleveland fathered an illegitimate child with a department store clerk, he arranged to have his son taken from her by force and adopted by another family. When the mother objected, Cleveland had her committed to an insane asylum. And the African-American mother of Strom Thurmond’s illegitimate child, a former maid in his parents’ house, never exposed Thurmond’s racist hypocrisy, but instead made do with whatever gifts he offered.
The Anna Nicole Smith story may be distasteful. But it hardly represents a more depraved morality than the “dignified silence” that surrounded deviations from the family values and marriage customs of the past.