very telling, I think...
Nov. 7th, 2006 08:19 am2 things. One cool, one troublesome...
Cool: Our polling place had 1 paperless touch-screen machine and 3 paper-ballot "stations". Only 1 person used the touch-screen while I was there. The rest, like me, were perfectly content to wait in line with our paper ballots and be sure that our vote will be counted right.
Troublesome: I've held no restraint on my contempt for current Republican party policy, but at the same time I prefer (as most do) not to vote for one because I'm voting against the other. The current situation has made that inevitable, of course, but that wasn't really what bothered me. What bothered me was the fact that the thought running through my head was "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause she's probably not going to win?"
not "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause she really doesn't have any experience?".
not "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause I really don't know how she stands on science education (though I can reasonably guess) or other issues?".
not even "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause not everything the other guy has done has sucked, just a few things?".
it was "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause I don't think she'll win?".
And that bothered me greatly.
A typical American thought to be sure, but I had kinda hoped that my education, my intellect, my reason would have kept me from thinking that most basic and primitive of "join the bandwagon" thoughts. It's thinking like that, primitive and base "only the winning matters", which created the two parties and has kept us in a two party system since 1783.
Cool: Our polling place had 1 paperless touch-screen machine and 3 paper-ballot "stations". Only 1 person used the touch-screen while I was there. The rest, like me, were perfectly content to wait in line with our paper ballots and be sure that our vote will be counted right.
Troublesome: I've held no restraint on my contempt for current Republican party policy, but at the same time I prefer (as most do) not to vote for one because I'm voting against the other. The current situation has made that inevitable, of course, but that wasn't really what bothered me. What bothered me was the fact that the thought running through my head was "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause she's probably not going to win?"
not "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause she really doesn't have any experience?".
not "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause I really don't know how she stands on science education (though I can reasonably guess) or other issues?".
not even "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause not everything the other guy has done has sucked, just a few things?".
it was "Do I really want to vote for her 'cause I don't think she'll win?".
And that bothered me greatly.
A typical American thought to be sure, but I had kinda hoped that my education, my intellect, my reason would have kept me from thinking that most basic and primitive of "join the bandwagon" thoughts. It's thinking like that, primitive and base "only the winning matters", which created the two parties and has kept us in a two party system since 1783.