I realize its in the "fashion" section, but is it really necessary for The Washington Post to run a column on the fact that Bush gives cheek-kisses to the female members his cabinet (and *only* the female members)?
sheesh, what a fucking waste of print. guys if you want to get rid of the label of being the "liberal" media, you have to stop making every stupid issue of the President one that requires a front-page placement (this was in page 1 of section "C"), much less one that has to be printed.
sheesh, what a fucking waste of print. guys if you want to get rid of the label of being the "liberal" media, you have to stop making every stupid issue of the President one that requires a front-page placement (this was in page 1 of section "C"), much less one that has to be printed.
Re: Novak is syndicated
Date: 2004-11-19 10:45 am (UTC)I know they have to be fair and balanced - and to *be* fair, they do a better job out there than many, but I'm still not all that happy with the Post. I've been reading the NY Times on Sundays and while both papers have had their problems, on the whole, the Times is a lot more interesting and witty a read.