Figure skating controversy much ado about nothing?:
there are judges who specifically look at the exactness of the technique - was a triple-something really a triple, etc, but otherwise, the main judges are just as they were before, looking at both technical and artistic.
But when Plushenko suggests judges can “arrange” a high placement, Barton begs to differ. He said the system cannot change a judge’s intent, but it can certainly minimize the impact one judge has on any program. Nine judges place marks in the system, two scores are randomly eliminated, then the highest and lowest of the remaining seven marks are eliminated. Technical specialists are also involved in assessing the levels of program elements and contribute to the final mark.so my idea was incorporated into the system - ditch the highs and lows, but in addition this implies random dropping as well, which i'm not as much of a fan of. random dropping out of 9 has too big an impact. no scientist or statistician would tell you that random dropping of samples yields better results.
there are judges who specifically look at the exactness of the technique - was a triple-something really a triple, etc, but otherwise, the main judges are just as they were before, looking at both technical and artistic.