why piss off the geeks? because it works...

[acroyear]

I, Cringely . The Pulpit . The Puppet Master | PBS:

So why did he do it? Why did he cut the price? I have no inside information here, but it seems pretty obvious to me: Apple introduced the iPhone at $599 to milk the early adopters and somewhat limit demand then dropped the price to $399 (the REAL price) to stimulate demand now that the product is a critical success and relatively bug-free. At least 500,000 iPhones went out at the old price, which means Apple made $100 million in extra profit.

Had nobody complained, Apple would have left it at that. But Jobs expected complaints and had an answer waiting — the $100 Apple store credit. This was no knee-jerk reaction, either. It was already there just waiting if needed. Apple keeps an undeserved $50 million and customers get $50 million back. Or do they? Some customers will never use their store credit. Those who do use it will nearly all buy something that costs more than $100. And, most importantly, those who bought their iPhones at an AT&T store will have to make what might be their first of many visits to an Apple Store. That is alone worth the $50 per customer this escapade will eventually cost Apple, taking into account unused credits and Apple Store wholesale costs.

So Apple still comes out $75 million ahead, which is important to Steve Jobs.

Comments

[thelongshot.livejournal.com]

I don't know why people would be upset about this. It is pretty much how every business operates with new products: milk the early adopters and then drop the price so that everyone else will buy. It is just that Jobs did it a lot sooner than most products.

Actually, a lot of people should be happy about the price drop. As for the early adopters, well they were willing to put 6 C-notes down on the thing. Obviously, they thought it was worth it at the time.