Mar. 21st, 2006

acroyear: (sp)
Bush Increasingly Focused On How Revisionist History Will See Him | The Onion - America's Finest News Source:
WASHINGTON, DC—With many of his administration's policies facing growing public disapproval, President Bush is reportedly becoming more concerned with how he will be portrayed by future revisionist historians. "Just last summer, the president never reflected on how apologists would spin his increased lobbying for an unpopular war, or how future far-right generations would justify his failed domestic policy initiatives," presidential scholar Dr. Robert Dallek said. "He reportedly asked an aide if, decades from now, the deluded would see him as great, like Ronald Reagan, or merely as a fully redeemed elder statesman, like Richard Nixon." Margaret Meehan, a spokesman for the National Board Of Historical Revision, offered no comment on any future portrayal of "America's most beloved and accomplished president."
acroyear: (smiledon)
Your state delegates now have two bills before them promoting the garbage that is "Intelligent Design".

House Bill 1228 would require school boards to "permit the teaching or discussion of the theory of intelligent design in humanities or philosophy classes" and moreover require it to develop and disseminate instructional materials for that purpose.  Note that yes, this bill slips it in there among language that prohibits it from being used in science classes and insists it doesn't "require" it to be taught at all.  Hence the catch: even if the school board rejects ID, they are required to spend money to create a "class" for it knowing it won't ever be taught.

House Bill 1531 would establish one of those obnoxious "Teachers Academic Freedom Act"s to "expressly protect the right of teachers identified by the United States Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard ... to present scientific critiques of prevailing scientific theories; and [to] expressly protect the right of students to hold a position on any views."  This text, is lifted straight from the rejected Santorum amendment to the No Child Left Behind act, and of course restricts the ability of a school or school board to terminate a teacher for teaching the "scientific views" of  Intelligent Design (even though they know, thanks to Dover, that it will lead directly to a $1,000,000 lawsuit in seconds).  This, of course, ignores the fact that there are no such scientific views or information for ID except that it isn't scientific at all.

An online petition is available to sign, but you're better off calling or writing to your state delegates.

Oh, and scientific and educational ignorance still knows no party.  Both bills were introduced by a Democrat, Emmett C. Burns, Jr. of District 10.

Friends, its your tax dollars that will be thrown away on lawyers if you let these pass.  Write NOW!

Profile

acroyear: (Default)
Joe's Ancient Jottings

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 24th, 2026 12:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios