acroyear: (ponder this)
Joe's Ancient Jottings ([personal profile] acroyear) wrote2008-12-20 11:16 am
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

Am I weird...

...for feeling like the Christmas Specials should be treated as x00 of the next season rather than x14 of the previous?

E.g., Last of the Time Lords is 3x13.  I personally treat Time Crash as 3x14 and Voyage of the Damned as 4x00.  Similarly, Runaway Bride is 3x00, not 2x14.  It's just not really an epilogue of the previous season to me - it's the prologue to the next.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[identity profile] scaleslea.livejournal.com 2008-12-23 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, considering that the BBC agrees with you, and it is their program... I don't think that is weird at all.

Doc

[identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com 2008-12-23 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
actually, it doesn't. there's lots of places that mark them as Nx14 rather than (N+1)x00, making it fairly inconsistent. the discussion on the doctor who comm said sometime the beeb marks them NxX.

[identity profile] scaleslea.livejournal.com 2008-12-23 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
The last three Christmas Specials have all kicked off the next season. They might not be labeled as episode 0, but they are packaged with that season on the DVDs.

The problem comes with this Christmas' Special and the fact that Season 5 has been pushed out to 2010. It's not Season 4, it's not season 5. It's Doctor Who 2009, which is just specials. So they kept numbering them with the season 4 numbers.

The Christmas invasion was 2.X, Runaway Bride was 3.X, Voyage of the Damned was 4.X. But The Next Doctor can't be 5.X because season 5 was postponed. So they're calling it 4.14.

Doc
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only