ext_199791 ([identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] acroyear 2013-01-14 11:58 pm (UTC)

it is still cowardice. 'free the bits' does nothing to solve the copyright law's inherent problems (including the lack of 'for a limited time'), the abuse of power by publishing corporations, or the lack of per-use compensation to artists.

if it was my papers he threw out there into the either without MY permission, i'd be pissed off at him rather than just apathetic. If I put my work on JSTOR, I agreed to the terms of doing so, regardless of if they were fair or not - I would have had alternatives including self-publishing.

I decide the value of MY work and how I choose to get it out there, not some kid with a depression and a grudge.

So again, I couldn't care less. It actually would increase my impression that it was cowardice, dying for a cause that would be better served by living to see it through to a *just* end. The people out there illegally dumping academic pdfs are just compounding the issue - again IT ISN'T THEIR'S TO DUMP out there.

The comparison to Arab Spring is hardly valid. An academic who agreed (by their own choice) to a contract that isn't necessarily in their optimal economic interest (but still have jobs and careers) is HARDLY the same thing as being born into a society where dictators decide if you will even get through the day without being arrested and tortured as being 'anti-government' merely because you accidentally started whistling a Bruce Springsteen song.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting